US boutique banks carry far higher capital costs than European universal lenders, with Evercore’s 9.65% WACC running at more than six times the 1.49% recorded by Crédit Agricole, according to new estimates compiled for icorp.co.uk.

Estimated WACC by bank (%)

Sources: Yahoo Finance; Federal Reserve (FRED); European Central Bank.
Equity risk premium: 5.0% (Damodaran, NYU Stern). Most recent annual filings.
Uncertainty: ±150–200 basis points.


WACC estimates: Close Brothers 0.49%; Mediobanca 1.41%; Credit Agricole 1.49%; Barclays 1.54%; BNP Paribas 1.74%; Standard Chartered 1.86%; Deutsche Bank 1.87%; HSBC Holdings 2.03%; Société Générale 2.08%; UBS Group 2.09%; Wells Fargo 2.55%; Bank of America 3.00%; Citigroup 3.16%; JPMorgan Chase 3.22%; Goldman Sachs 4.35%; Morgan Stanley 4.51%; Lazard 6.62%; PJT Partners 6.82%; Evercore 9.65%
US bank
European bank


The gap between American and European investment banking rivals is starker than headline figures suggest. Stripping out the US boutiques — Evercore, Lazard, and PJT Partners — whose near-debt-free balance sheets mechanically inflate their weighted average cost of capital, the nine calculable US banks still average a WACC of roughly 3.00% against a European peer-group average of approximately 1.70%. The driver is structural: European universal banks fund themselves overwhelmingly with cheap deposits and wholesale liabilities that dwarf their equity bases, suppressing the blended cost of capital even as their cost of equity runs lower in absolute terms owing to a softer risk-free rate.

WACC is the blended minimum return a bank must earn across its entire funding base to create value for investors. It combines the cost of equity — what shareholders require — with the after-tax cost of debt — what creditors charge — weighted by each source’s share of total funding. For this analysis, the cost of equity is calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model: risk-free rate plus beta multiplied by a 5.0% equity risk premium, the latter drawn from Aswath Damodaran’s (NYU Stern) published global estimate. Beta for each bank is a five-year monthly regression against its domestic equity index, sourced from Yahoo Finance via the yfinance library. The US risk-free rate of 4.30% is the 10-year Treasury yield from the Federal Reserve’s FRED database; the European rate of 3.04% is the 10-year German Bund yield from the European Central Bank. The after-tax cost of debt is calculated as annual interest expense divided by total interest-bearing liabilities — proxied here as total assets minus shareholders’ equity, capturing deposits, repo, and long-term debt — multiplied by one minus the effective tax rate. Figures are drawn from the most recent annual filings sourced via Yahoo Finance and SEC EDGAR. WACC weights use market capitalisation for equity and total liabilities for debt, following theoretically preferable market-value rather than book-value weighting.

The transatlantic divergence is anchored in two compounding factors: a higher US risk-free rate and balance-sheet architecture. JPMorgan Chase, the largest US bank by assets at $4,424.9 billion, carries a WACC of 3.22% with equity representing just 17.90% of its funding mix. Bank of America ($3,411.7bn in assets) comes in at 3.00%, and Citigroup at 3.16%. Wells Fargo is the cheapest US universal bank at 2.55%, reflecting a beta of just 0.93 — below the market — and an equity weight of 11.50%. Across the Atlantic, BNP Paribas ($2,793.0bn in assets) records a WACC of 1.74%, Barclays 1.54%, and Crédit Agricole 1.49% — the lowest in the European cohort — partly because its equity accounts for only 2.60% of its funding base. HSBC Holdings, despite its $332.2bn market capitalisation making it the largest European bank in this group by that measure, produces a WACC of just 2.03%, held down by a beta of 0.58, the lowest in the entire dataset, reflecting its diversified, Asia-weighted revenue base. The lower European risk-free rate — 126 basis points below the US equivalent — mechanically reduces every European bank’s cost of equity before beta is even applied.

The outliers at both ends of the distribution tell distinct stories. Evercore, the US advisory boutique, records the highest WACC in the sample at 9.65%, with equity comprising 81.10% of its $5.4bn total asset base — a consequence of the near-absence of balance-sheet leverage that characterises pure advisory models. Lazard, similarly structured, registers 6.62%, and PJT Partners 6.82%, the latter carrying zero reported interest-bearing debt and a beta of 0.84. Goldman Sachs, the most highly leveraged of the US investment banks relative to its equity weight of 16.10%, comes in at 4.35%, the highest WACC among the bulge-bracket cohort, reflecting a beta of 1.29 — the second-highest in the US universal bank group — and an after-tax cost of debt of 3.12%, the highest in the sample, sourced from its annual filing interest expense data. At the low end, Close Brothers, the British merchant bank, records a WACC of just 0.49%, driven by a tiny equity weight of 5.30% against $14.1bn in assets and a reported after-tax cost of debt of zero — a figure that warrants caution and likely reflects a data gap in the interest expense line rather than genuinely costless funding. Mediobanca similarly records zero after-tax cost of debt, producing a WACC of 1.41% derived almost entirely from its equity weight of 21.00%. Note: Jefferies Financial could not be included in this analysis because beta data was unavailable from the yfinance source at the time of calculation.

Readers should treat these figures as directional rather than definitive. The estimates carry an uncertainty range of approximately ±150–200 basis points, arising from several sources. The 5.0% equity risk premium used throughout is a consensus estimate from Damodaran rather than an observable market price; a one percentage point shift in that assumption moves each bank’s cost of equity by its full beta — meaning Goldman Sachs’s cost of equity alone could shift by ±1.29 percentage points. Beta is a backward-looking five-year measure and may not capture recent changes in business mix, regulatory capital requirements, or post-acquisition risk profiles. The liability proxy — total assets minus shareholders’ equity — overstates interest-bearing liabilities for banks carrying large non-interest-bearing deposits or derivatives payables, which compresses reported cost-of-debt figures and likely explains the zero readings for Close Brothers and Mediobanca. European figures originally reported in euros are converted at prevailing exchange rates via Yahoo Finance, introducing minor currency translation noise. Annual filing data may lag market conditions by up to 12 months. These figures are best used for relative comparison across the peer group, not as precise hurdle rates for individual institutions.

WACC calculations based on most recent annual filings sourced via Yahoo Finance. Beta and market capitalisation from Yahoo Finance (22 June 2026). Risk-free rates: US 10-year Treasury 4.30% (Federal Reserve/FRED); EU 10-year German Bund 3.04% (European Central Bank). Equity risk premium 5.0% (Aswath Damodaran, NYU Stern).